To the editor:
After reading the latest of several articles from RaeLynn Ricarte concerning the MCMC trial, it is quite obvious that the Chronicle could not have found a more biased person to report the proceedings.
I thought it was the reporter’s (and ultimately the paper’s) responsibility to report the news from both sides of an issue, to let the public form their own opinion.
This reporter seems bent on delivering her opinion, to sway the public by skewing the testimony of witnesses and to paint a very one sided view of the trial and the hospital. To say the least I am very disappointed in how this trial was covered by your paper as is virtually everyone I speak to.