The Riverhawk looks kind of wimpy and sad eyed, not fierce at all. I had no idea that was a river until I read it in the editorial. Do we really want a mascot logo that has to be explained when you look at it? Good for Eric Nerdin for asking for alternatives.
This editorial doesn't make sense. The students had nothing to do with the debacle 10 years ago over the mascot. The school board ignored the students and went with their own choice. This year the committee is trying to do the same thing, ignore the vote the students have already taken and go with their own choice. Let the students decide.
Last login: Friday, February 9, 2018
Information from The Chronicle and our advertisers (Want to add your business to this to this feed?)