In the middle of the first presidential impeachment trial, of Andrew Johnson in 1868, Walt Whitman wandered over to Capitol Hill to witness the proceedings. “Our American politics,” the poet told a friend, “are in an unusually effervescent condition.”

A century and a half later — and 127 years after Whitman’s death — our American politics are in an unusually effervescent condition again. In a month that included President Donald J. Trump’s State of the Union address, it became increasingly clear that there were several moving parts to American politics — and that American politics was changing dramatically, and importantly.

Washington Republicans — first resistant to Trump, then the captive of the Manhattan billionaire, more recently resistant again to the president — are in the throes of a profound identity crisis, tethered to a chief executive they revile but cannot repudiate, ardently supporting some of his policies, reluctantly swallowing others. Such conflicting sentiments are exceedingly rare, experienced only by the Whigs who grew impatient with John Tyler in 1841, the Democrats who split under Franklin Pierce in 1856 and James Buchanan in 1858, the Republicans who grew weary of William Howard Taft in 1912, and the Democrats who grew skeptical of Jimmy Carter in 1980.

The two profiles of the president — Prince Charming to some, the Prince of Darkness to others — were apparent during his nationally televised message, especially when he combined an appeal for bipartisanship with his dismissal of the “ridiculous partisan investigations” examining any ties he has to the Russians. The great conflicts of the age were on full display when he issued a generous salute to the women now serving on Capitol Hill, a record 102 female House members, 89 of them Democrats. Many of them were elected to Congress as a rebuke to Trump himself.

But the spectacle on Capitol Hill  was only a part of the rapidly changing scene in American politics.

For years one of the principal struggles in Congress was between Republicans who were troubled about the swiftly mounting costs of Social Security and Medicare entitlement programs and Democrats determined to preserve these benefits. And yet for the last four presidential elections, voters over 65 have sided with the Republican candidate.

The Democrats now are plotting an offensive to win back those voters. Democrats have just introduced legislation in the House  to boost benefits and adjust payment schedules to the advantage of the very blue-collar voters who migrated into the Trump column two years ago.

The change in House control is changing the entire conversation in Washington.

The new capital conversation is apparent in debate over climate change, newly revived by the Democratic capture of the House. This debate was largely dead while the GOP controlled both houses of Congress with a president who believed the concept was a hoax. Last week, there were two House hearings on a so-called “Green New Deal.” This is occurring as (overly optimistic, perhaps unrealistic) House Democrats discuss how to distribute revenues from a carbon tax.

The fresh agenda of Congress also is reflected in new debate over stock buyouts, with three Democratic presidential candidates or potential candidates — Senators Elizabeth Warren, Kirsten Gillibrand and Bernie Sanders — suddenly talking about restrictions on how much stock companies can buy back from shareholders, an effort to limit corporate advantages tucked into the 2017 Trump tax bill.

The biggest new change — the one with the most significant possible consequences — is the emerging Republican view of the president.

Trump, to be sure, won wild applause from the GOP side of the House chamber during his speech Tuesday night when he pushed some of the buttons that reliably set Republican hearts aflutter. Jimmy Carter had the same effect in 1979, when he noted the creation of 7.1 million new jobs and the reduction of unemployment by a quarter and then, in an attempt to rob Sen. Edward M. Kennedy of his spoke boldly of taking “our first steps” to a national health plan.”

There is no Kennedy-type figure to take on Trump in his re-nomination drive yet, but Republicans increasingly are resistant to some of the president’s tactics, style and priorities.

Trump’s relations with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell have changed as swiftly as this winter’s weather in the Northeast — freezes followed by thaws only to be overtaken by new freezes. There is a distinct chill in the congressional air right now, with the Kentucky lawmaker unenthusiastic about the Trump Syria policy and his wall rhetoric and even less eager to support an emergency declaration to begin border construction.

The next few months will be critical for both parties. Somehow the president and Congress will have to find a sliver of common ground to keep the government operating.

But all is not lost. Pitchers and catchers start reporting to spring training on Monday. Washington is going to have to start playing ball soon, too.

—David M. Shribman is executive editor emeritus of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. He can be reached at dshribman@post-gazette.com.

Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.