To the editor:

I was pleased to see in the news recently that Oregon District 2 Rep. Greg Walden has taken an interest in the opioid crisis in Oregon.

He made statements about the severity of the problem and the great need for treatment, and he postured verbally against the DEA for failing to meet his demands for additional data on the subject.

For messaging purposes, so far, so good. But for actually meeting the needs of people affected by opioid addiction, not so good. How does Mr. Walden reconcile his claims of deep concern and of commitment to treatment with his catastrophic failed health care proposal (AHCA), which would have stripped millions of their access to health care? Or his embrace of the new tax bill that will indeed decimate medical care by yet a different route? Or his endorsement of Trump’s budget, which severely slashes funding for mental health programs? Or his approval of Trump’s declaration of the opioid crisis as a public health emergency, but not important enough to merit funding?

I encourage Mr. Walden’s interest in the opioid crisis, and hope he will develop policies that support broad access to comprehensive treatment, to go along with his messaging.

Lynda Sacamano

Mosier

Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.